Ec2 pricing m1.large12/13/2023 ![]() But you don't get an enormous bill and then hope they let you off, the credit runs out and everything goes dark instead.Īmazon seems to believe that so few people care about this they don't need to compete. Accidentally picked the turbo-fast Azure SQL instance instead of the toy one you actually needed to demo Power BI? Ditto. ![]() Added 1TB of SSD to a virtual machine when you meant 1GB? That's gonna burn your $150 real fast. So, the only option for Microsoft is to have a water-tight shut off once you spend $150. If Azure "mistakenly" lets a student spend $5000 it doesn't get to bill their credit card or chase them with debt collectors, those student accounts don't have any money, don't have a credit card, may have no bank account, so long as some institution paid for Visual Studio licenses there may not even be a real human being behind them. Why does it have that? Because Azure gives away $150/ month Azure credits to students with Visual Studio. I'm not a Microsoft fan (he writes from his Linux desktop) but I was astonished that Azure actually has working "This is how much we can spend, and literally no more" behaviour coming from previously working with AWS where that's either entirely unavailable or black magic known only to experts. Place I used to work at would investigate buyers for this reason (difference being we really did give our customers free reign with the equipment, we just had to try to stop fraud and other things). It's relatively common for companies to use shell companies or employees to buy hardware off the record for investigative purposes. But this isn't really necessary - the case where Microsoft got slapped for motherboard locking Windows XP and had to undo it shows that if software is integral to the operation of a device rights to its use are transferred along with the sale of the item, much to the chagrin of CNC companies everywhere who have yet to be challenged on this. They can refuse to sell to you if they think you'll do something with it, but if you get it from them by lying or from a second hand sale they can't do anything.įor software you can also have person A buy something, then give it to person B who didn't click a license agreement. This is what a sale legally is, it terminates the rights of the former owner. I don't think they're enforceable in the US either. ![]() It feels like a modern regression that there have been so many asterisks added to this straightforward & obvious right. Questions like how Apple is allowed to ban other browsers show related type of confusion over the vast ecosystem control that seems to be spreading, but there at least there's some cloudy App Store Apple clearly retains some rights of control over.įirst-sale rights in America is fairly narrow in what they permit, but in America at least, there's very much been an idea that consumers become owners of the things they buy. ![]() It's wild to me that company's can just make up whatever terms of use they feel like & we have to accept that.Įdit: oh hello, i'm at -4! Anyone care to defend your outrage at my outrage? What makes this seem at all ok? This seems so fundamentally screwy to me. Another example is Nvidia explicitly dis-allowing their consumer GPUs to be used in data-centers. I have such a hard time imagining what sick twisting legal crap allows Apple to dictate terms like this. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |